It's increasingly obvious that AI will replace most of the content and skills currently taught in schools. It's the great unsaid precisely because it's terrifying. It's a question becoming writ large in society as a whole. What does it mean to be a human intelligence when surpassed by AI. This is precisely the reason the PrimarAI school model foregrounds the uniquely human aspects of the curriculum that will give our kids a fighting chance in the world they will enter. these

This is becoming more urgent by the day. Parents and teachers need to know their students are prepared and empowered for the real world they will inhabit. PrimarAI is the most up to date and innovative response to a world that is consistently verified as being completely transformed by AI, and within months and years, not decades. Join the conversation, engage with an Alternative way to day after day of content delivery at the front of a classroom.

The PrimarAI School

When frightened, do we fight or flight? At the moment, our instintc is to flight from AI. It appears threatening at every turn. If we then pass this onto our children, then they will be stuck in a paradox. How do i ignore something that is going to impact every aspect of my life? I've developed a primary school model that does the opposite. By integrating AI into the framework of the school day, it simply empowers kids to be able to face their future with confidance. When Pri

Artificial intelligence is already in Australian primary classrooms, yet no one has shown what a primary school designed for it would actually look like, and this paper sets out to fill that gap. It argues that AI-supported practice can take on much of the repetitive work of learning foundations, and that schools should spend the time this frees on what only people can give, teachers who know students well, sustained reading, writing and talk, and real responsibility in a com

There is so much negative media regards Ai at the moment, and good reason. Trust is out the window, so why would you support a school that has an Ai coach? This coach isn't like chatgpt for kids. It would be intricately calibrated to each student. Would respond to their interests immediately and form engagement not through manipulation but by using real time data from the student to tailor the lesson to exactly the right level and exactly the right content. This is simply an

It’s not hard to see a reality staring in the face. Most of the current syllabus is naturally based on the world we see now, it’s not hard to see how AI will for better or worse completely upend the skills needed to thrive in a world it will inevitably shape. I wrote the PrinarAI school plan as a way to give students a fighting chance in the world they will inhabit. A chance to hone the uniquely human skills that will be so much more valuable. That’s why PrimarAI gives 2 hrs

The uniquely Australian school that uses AI in a positive, safe way to give students back time to focus on what matters. The latest October version of 'The Primarai School' paper is published here www.primarai.com.ai

A NSW school unlike any other. Giving teacher the ipportunity to make the impact they went into the proffesion to make. It uses AI coaching to help guide core subject content, using endless patience and no judgement, that gives buckets more time for students to concentrate on what matters, real world learning, creating, social learning, resilience, money management, relationship management... All the things that matter to their lives, and that the world will value when they g

China and the UAE made AI education compulsory from the 2025-26 school year. New Zealand is heading for a compulsory AI learning area by 2027 and ran a national Day of AI in schools this year. Alabama now requires AI instruction to graduate, one of 77 bills across 27 American states, and WA is spending $4.6 million putting its ClassmAIte tool into more than a hundred schools. Meanwhile I went looking through the NSW Science and Technology syllabus arriving in 2027 for a menti

Fifteen things a Year 6 kid graduating from the school I'm describing has to be able to do. Read fluently, write a 2,000-word researched piece, and edit their own work Work across the whole NSW K-6 maths syllabus with mastery, not bluff Give a ten-minute talk to a room of unfamiliar adults, no notes Lead a yarning circle on a topic they chose Swim a kilometre in open water and handle themselves around a small boat Finish a half marathon or equivalent Cook a meal for thirty pe

Australian teachers work 46.5 hours a week according to TALIS, third longest in the OECD, and 34 per cent report high stress against an OECD average of 19. Every AI product in education promises the same fix, time saved, and one commonly quoted figure is six weeks a year for regular users. Suppose it's true. My prediction is that not a minute of it reaches a child. It'll be absorbed by data entry, compliance, a new framework, a platform that needs populating. Teacher workload

The ABC's 7.30 took its cameras into Australian classrooms recently to see how schools are handling generative AI, and one comment from the report has stuck with me ever since. A UNSW lecturer put it plainly: it's not a question of whether students are ready for the AI revolution, because they're already in it. No waiting, no lead time, no phased rollout. The kids are living through it right now, and everything else in the debate has to start from that fact. What the report s

Here it is, before someone else finds it. The whole two-hour morning depends on a tutor that doesn't exist. I've described an AI that knows where a child sits against every NSW outcome, pitches work at their edge, asks Socratic questions instead of answering, flags the coach when a kid's been stuck for two minutes, runs on Australian infrastructure and never trains on student work. Nothing on the market does all of that. EduChat is close on privacy and stops at Year 5. The Am

California now requires companion chatbots to tell a minor they're talking to a machine, and to repeat the reminder every three hours. We have legislated for machines to periodically remind children they aren't people, because otherwise the children forget. That's where we are. UNICEF put out a policy brief on AI companions and kids in June, eSafety did the same in March, and Harvard Business Review's research keeps finding that the most common use of AI, two years running, i

Australian schools are tightening the screws on AI at the moment, and honestly, I understand why. The ABC has been covering it closely, with education departments across the country cracking down on students using AI to cheat, and NSW going as far as pausing take-home assessments while it reviews what AI is doing to student learning. Behind all of that sits a genuine fear of cheating, of over-reliance, of kids outsourcing the very thinking that school exists to build. Those f

As an Aussie guy who grew up in Sydney, I never had that sort of cultural baggage of extreme entrepreneurism and the winner versus loser tropes and memes that run like a thread through American culture, for better or worse. So when I found myself drawn to Alpha School, an American, venture-flavoured, unashamedly disruptive model, it was a strange fit for me. I've sat with that strangeness for a while now, and I've come to think it's actually an advantage. Being outside the cu

There wasn't one big moment. It was day after day of seeing what could be done, and working with students who I realised were learning stuff that was clearly never going to be needed, or skills that were never going to be required in the future. You stand in a classroom in 2026 with a full picture of what AI can already do, and you watch children carefully practising things that the world outside the gate has quietly stopped asking for. What made it worse was the recognition

It was a podcast that did it. I heard the founder of Alpha School being interviewed, and he genuinely, obviously cares about education. Sure, he had an ego, the sort you can imagine a billionaire would have. But he was also willing to say he's made mistakes and will make mistakes in the future. That stopped me. Not the two-hour learning claims, not the growth data, not the vision of AI tutors. The admission of error. Education reform has a graveyard, and it's full of confiden

I was wondering why the Alpha way seems so attractive straight off. I think it's because it embodies so much of what progressive education was trying to achieve, and it manages to be both bold and revolutionary while having the students' wellbeing in mind most of all. That combination is rarer than it sounds. Education reform usually gives you one or the other. You get bold ideas that treat children as an afterthought, or you get warm, child-centred rhetoric that never actual